Economics and similar, for the sleep-deprived

A subtle change has been made to the comments links, so they no longer pop up. Does this in any way help with the problem about comments not appearing on permalinked posts, readers?

Update: seemingly not

Update: Oh yeah!


Friday, July 29, 2011

 
Christ, what a moron

If the Reuters comments system wasn't so annoying I wouldn't have to bother you lot with these ... also from Felix's site, Alan Greenspan:

Since the devastating Japanese earthquake and, earlier, the global financial tsunami, governments have been pressed to guarantee their populations against virtually all the risks exposed by those extremely low probability events. But should they? Guarantees require the building up of a buffer of idle resources that are not otherwise engaged in the production of goods and services. They are employed only if, and when, the crisis emerges.


An earthquake, in Japan, is not an "extremely low probability event". Like the eventual collapse of the San Andreas Fault (which will not be a "Black Swan", when it happens, btw), it is pretty much a probability one event. It is a low frequency event, but that is not the same thing at all. The words "only if, and" should be deleted from the last sentence quoted above, which makes the whole thing correct and shows you why social guarantees against inevitable but difficult-to-plan-for events are an obviously good idea, which is why literally every literate society ever has had them as a top priority. Alan Greenspan presumably hasn't got life assurance because seriously, death, how many of those are you likely to go through in your life?

Tangentially related to this, and to the post below, the original Twitter rumour that motivated that discussion was one to the effect that "Piers Morgan has been sacked by CNN". I would say that this is in the class of statements that were false when made, but which are basically true statements waiting for reality to catch up with them. If the newspapers ever mistakenly print my death, I plan to write to the obits editor concerned and reassure him that "History will vindicate you one day".
9 comments this item posted by the management 7/29/2011 05:28:00 AM
 
We're all linked up in a great big social network. Not you, you're in a different network

Illegally copying music, calling people nasty names on the internet ... the world is full of things which are a) basically pretty obviously morally wrong, but b) fun. And therefore, there's always a market for clever and counterintuitive arguments to the effect that they are actually not wrong at all! They're just new! And probably actually quite essential to our modern way of life.

So it is, I think, with the modern, wired, "connected", socially networked concept of "passing on spurious shite that you read off Twitter". Which differs from mere "gossiping" in a myriad ways which take five hundred words to explain why. Felix explains that Twitter isn't really a kind of broadcast media, it's a social networking site and so the standards should be those of the lads and lasses gossiping in the news room, not yeractual journalism.

The thing is, is Twitter like a newsroom? Maybe. But you know, given the job I do, I pretty much know from rumours. And in my world, although people trade in tips and hearsay all the time, you make a pretty big effort not to get a reputation for passing on crap. And if you do pass on something that turns out to be bollocks, I think you'd expect to apologise to the people you passed it on to. I expect that newsrooms are just the same - that journalists do gossip a lot with each other, but that it isn't possible to have the reputation of your professional work completely isolated from the quality of the stuff you pass on there either. In actual fact I'm sure Felix thinks so too - Twitter has a direct message facility and if Felix used that to pass on a rumour to me, I'm sure he'd regard himself as standing behind it.

So I think that in the view of Twitter linked above, Felix wants it to be like a newsroom, but like a newsroom which happens to have a massive tour party of schoolchildren or visiting trade delegations walking through it. People who are just visiting a newsroom are allowed to hang around, and pick up the excitement of the general vibe, and they can even get a bit of a vicarious thrill by listening to some of the goss that nobody dares print, or the stories covered by superinjunctions. But if you're an outsider you're certainly not allowed to rely on the miscellaneous blag you happen to overhear in the newsroom. There's a small interlinked social network of people who trust each other and swap information, and who value their reputations with each other for sifting out good stuff from bad, but who also know how to interpret each other's style and are usually aware of how much personal credibility someone is investing in a particular piece of information (the FT Alphaville blog even does this with marks out of ten).

And then there's a horde of plebs who are allowed access to the unmediated stream, but they don't have any idea of the underlying matrix of Bayesian weights that would allow them to make it into anything useful. And the insiders' view of the outsiders is that the outsiders should only be viewing this stuff as entertainment and they hardly give a toss if the outsiders end up materially misinformed, because the outsiders shouldn't be using the proceeds of their eavesdropping as a source of information in the first place; if it's information they want, they can get their backsides down to the newsagent and pay for it.

It's definitely got an internal logic. It seems a bit odd to me, but then I come from a somewhat different culture. This tension between media industry insiders and outsiders[1] from off the internet has been playing out for years now, and it's still fascinating.

[1] Particularly, of course, outsiders who are actually a bit tasty themselves - "gentlemen" who are better than the "players". I've remarked in the past that contra Andrew Marr, "bloggers" are in general normal human beings who, in their area of expertise, know a hell of a lot[2] more than he does. But this was actually underselling things; there have been plenty of regular commenters on my various blogs who as far as I can tell were actually teenagers (and who therefore probably did live with their parents, and probably did have occasional outbreaks of acne) and I've often been very impressed indeed with the level of knowledge of quite specialised areas that they were able to demonstrate based on nothing other than curiosity, lots of spare time and widespread availability of primary sources online. It really is a new information economy in some ways.

[2] A wonderful example of this was at some lecture when David Aaronovitch, after talking for an hour about bloggers, excused himself with the words "I have to leave because I'm going to an interview with the Nobel Prize-winning economist Amartya Sen. You wouldn't get a blogger doing that". I calculated at the time that if you added up the contributors and blogroll of Crooked Timber, between them they would likely have had sufficient hours of face-time with Amartya Sen that if he'd been an aeroplane, they'd have been able to fly him.
8 comments this item posted by the management 7/29/2011 03:12:00 AM

Tuesday, July 26, 2011

 
To infinity, and beyond

Even though I am not really a fan of much science fiction this is really good news. via theguardian blog.
52 comments this item posted by the management 7/26/2011 07:14:00 AM

Thursday, July 21, 2011

 
Ee-aye-ee-aye-ee-aye oh, up the World Bank Income Classifications we go!

Yay! The land of my birth gained promotion to "Lower middle income" from "low income" last week - this is the development economics equivalent of getting from the Conference to League Two. Zambia were promoted alongside fellow perennial resources-state battlers Ghana.

As the Guardian article points out, although this has a lot to do with the copper boom (and Chinese investment), it is also the case that foreign aid increased as a proportion of Zambian GDP, and the authors are correct to note that this is a palpable win for the "aid works" lobby.

Also interesting: pop-up solar powered internet cafes. One of the Great Lost Posts from "project Zambia" three years ago was going to be an explanation of why I was much more sympathetic to the "one laptop per child" idea than most of my mates - stripped of the child-related mawkishness it was a great big ICT development strategy. And as we noted, the thing about human beings is that we really like communications technology, and we're often surprisingly good at using it.
1 comments this item posted by the management 7/21/2011 06:58:00 AM

Wednesday, July 20, 2011

 
The world's second lowest productivity industry

Unemployment. Furthermore, despite decades of technological advance in the rest of the economy, unemployment remains stubbornly at the bottom of the pile. There have been no major efficiency gains in unemployment in the last hundred years.

Normally I am sceptical of industrial policy, but when the government starts talking about moving resources out of unemployment, I think there is good reason to believe that they might be picking a winner.

[regular readers of this blog will, of course, be aware of what the world's first lowest productivity industry is, and perhaps of the curious tendency of right-wing political parties to want to subsidise it]
29 comments this item posted by the management 7/20/2011 06:11:00 AM

Wednesday, July 13, 2011

 
Around and about in Companies House WebCheck

The Centre for Social Cohesion, number 06609071 - annual return overdue!

The CSC were taken over by the Henry "Scoop" Jackson Society earlier in the year, but their company registration is still marked "Active", and they're now two weeks away from triggering a fine. A bit worrying because the Scoopies have historically had excellent organisational skills (when it comes to administrative matters anyway - on things like avoiding some really embarrassing tacking-in-the-wind with respect to Hosni Mubarak, less so).

Worth noting, btw, that although historically the legal entity has been "The Henry Jackson Society Project For Democratic Geopolitics" (a trust registered with the Charities Commission), there is now "The Henry Jackson Society", a company limited by guarantee number 07465741, which is also registered with the CC. I am not sure why - Philip Blond's Respublica has two legal entities for fairly sensible VAT reasons, so it's probably that. In any case, since CSC is now folded into H'S'JS, they ought to either get rid of the legal entity or make its filings properly - they are registered to the same address on Pentonville Road so it shouldn't be difficult.

Update: Meanwhile, the Quilliam Foundation, the organisation for reformed Islamist morons, is holding an event for former EDL morons. As always, the USP is "I have a history of being a hell of a moron, so you should listen to me". Because if you can't rely on morons, who can you rely on?

There is actually a business model here. Northern Ireland (I seem to remember Marc Mulholland once telling me) has quite the cottage industry of reformed terrorists doing the learn-from-my-terrible-example circuit (substantial overlap with the "True Crime" thrill-to-these-depraved-deeds industry), but England and Wales less so. The trouble, there as here, is that in many cases, people who have shed their extremist beliefs have not always finished losing the deep-seated personality problems that drove them into extremist politics in the first place. There's a niche for the twelve-step people here; rather than taking up our time with their policy programs and suchlike, I think Quilliam would be better advised to get into the rehabilitation business full-time and rebrand themselves Morons Anonymous.

Labels:


5 comments this item posted by the management 7/13/2011 01:48:00 AM

Friday, July 01, 2011

 
Nukemen, slight return

Further evidence that it would only be possible to have a sensible debate about the role of nuclear in the UK's future energy strategy if we first got rid of nearly everyone currently working in nukemanship, on both the industry and policy sides.
60 comments this item posted by the management 7/01/2011 12:51:00 AM


This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?




Links:

Bitch : Lab
Aaronovitch Watch
Balkanalysis
Perfect.co.uk
Maxspeak
Brad Delong
The Robert Vienneau blog

Political and philosophical heroes

Subcomandante Marcos
Will Rogers
Boris Vian
The English Svejk

RSS Feed:
This seems to matter to a lot of people

If you liked this "Daniel Davies" website, you might be interested in

"Danux", the web developer
The martial artist (and fan of extremely annoying Flash intros) from Blackburn
The Welsh political journalist
A Scouse computer programmer who collects Soviet cameras
"Danimal", the heavy metal drummer
Canada's finest recorder of radio jingles
More of the same, at the Guardian
A tailor's in Lampeter where Jimmy Carter once bought a hat
An advertising man who has written a novel about dogging (I think we sometimes get each other's email)
An award-winning facilities manager in Dubai
The son of the guitarist from the Kinks Update: he is apparently "balls-out motherfucking shit-dicked exxxstatic" to be included on a Kerrang magazine giveaway CD of Iron Maiden covers, which is nice.
"Fritz Gretel" from the Ramones film "Rock 'n' Roll High School"
The former presenter of the leading politics talk radio show on the Isle of Man, now a business change manager in the Manx government secretary's office
An aquarium curator in Sussex who keeps on scoring home runs like this (this is the first stable link I've found, but he is constantly kicking ass in acquarial terms)

If you didn't like this "Daniel Davies" website, then don't give up on the Daniel Davies industry completely!

An American "Christian Political Analyst" who has the same name as me
A student at Patrick Henry College
these two might be the same guy ...
"Scatter", the deceased Liberian gangster
A naked man stuck in a chimney in Wigan
A thug in Barrow



This blog has been going downhill since ...

August 2002
September 2002
October 2002
November 2002
December 2002
January 2003
February 2003
March 2003
April 2003
May 2003
June 2003
July 2003
August 2003
September 2003
November 2003
December 2003
March 2004
April 2004
May 2004
May 2005
June 2005
July 2005
August 2005
September 2005
October 2005
November 2005
December 2005
January 2006
February 2006
March 2006
April 2006
May 2006
June 2006
July 2006
August 2006
September 2006
October 2006
November 2006
December 2006
January 2007
February 2007
March 2007
April 2007
May 2007
June 2007
July 2007
August 2007
September 2007
October 2007
November 2007
December 2007
January 2008
February 2008
March 2008
April 2008
May 2008
June 2008
July 2008
August 2008
September 2008
October 2008
November 2008
December 2008
January 2009
February 2009
March 2009
April 2009
May 2009
June 2009
July 2009
August 2009
September 2009
October 2009
November 2009
December 2009
January 2010
February 2010
March 2010
April 2010
May 2010
June 2010
July 2010
August 2010
September 2010
October 2010
November 2010
December 2010
January 2011
February 2011
March 2011
April 2011
May 2011
June 2011
July 2011
August 2011
September 2011
October 2011
November 2011
December 2011
January 2012
February 2012
March 2012
April 2012
May 2012
June 2012
July 2012
August 2012
September 2012
October 2012
December 2012
February 2013
April 2013
June 2013
July 2013
August 2013
March 2014
April 2014
August 2014
October 2015
March 2023