Thursday, September 20, 2007

Davros: history's worst industrial designer

I don't know why, but this particular bee chose today to start flying round my bonnet once more. I think I posted it in Nick Barlow's comments once but it has disappeared. Anyway. Daleks. How crap are they?

Since I am neither a stand-up comedian nor a guest on one of those "I Love The 80s" nostalgia TV shows ("eeeeee, them Daleks were right scary weren't they? And wasn't the Texan bar difficult to eat? Hey, do you remember the Euston Manifesto?"), I am not even going to bother with "the stairs thing". It was obviously the biggest Dalek-related issue, but the scriptwriters were eventually embarrassed into doing something about it[1], and have presumably chucked into the memory hole all the earlier episodes where important plot points turned on Daleks not being able to climb stairs. Whatever the heck, I say.

But even if we spot them the absurdly low skirt clearance and use of castors instead of, say, tank tracks, there are still a number of bizarre design decisions made at key stages during the development of the Dalek. Viz:

The eyestalk. Point one, the Dalek has a single eye and therefore cannot judge distance. Point two, that single eye is more or less unprotected and located on a great big eyestalk protruding three feet from its armoured body. This makes it trivially easy to render a Dalek blind and helpless by something as simple as hanging a hat off its eyestalk.

The exterminator. The exterminator is actually a pretty fine weapon, but it is mounted on a tiny little stub on the front of the Dalek, reducing its field of fire to a pretty small cone in the direction that the Dalek is facing. If you look at most tanks (and a Dalek is basically a fighting vehicle so I'd suggest the same design principles apply), then you'll see that the big sticky-out thing which rotates 360 degree is the gun and the little thing practically recessed within the body is the window. I don't understand why Davros thought it would be a good idea to reverse these principles.

The plunger. Quite the stupidest of the stupid. The only tool a Dalek has for manipulating objects is a single plumber's plunger sticking out from the body. Davros himself has two hands and uses them, so why did he not realise that a similar capability would be useful for Daleks? The complete inability of Daleks to manipulate small objects, or to hold two things at the same time, had massive practical consequences as it meant that they were always totally dependent on unreliable slave-races for any industrial or mining projects they carried out, with numerous galaxy-conquest plans falling apart for precisely this reason. And they never did anything about it! By the end of the last Doctor Who series the Daleks had genetically engineered themselves, were masters of interplanetary travel, and could fucking travel through time, but they still couldn't eat with a knife and fork. Unbelievable.


[1] As far as I can see, the writer who bit the bullet on this one was Ben Aaronovitch, brother of David. The episode in which it is explained that the Daleks intended to bring peace and democracy to the rest of the universe and that they were the true inheritors of the tradition of George Orwell is still forthcoming. Update: sorry, done that one

Update: and furthermore, despite all the pious words about Frodo "not being corrupted", I maintain that Lord of the Rings describes one of the worst-planned military expeditions possible. And given the total absence of post-invasion planning, I am pretty sure that there is an Elvish garrison still hanging around in Mordor a zillion years later, with Gandalf explaining that a premature exit would lead to civil war and we need to stay the course, while Galadriel mumbles some bullshit about Pottery Barn.

12 comments:

  1. You forget, both Gandalf & Galadriel had absconded to Valinor to take up Ivy League presidencies and think-tank senior fellowships by then.

    Actually, the entire kingdom of Gondor counts as an over-the-horizon military base.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Brilliant. I can't wait to read your opinion about whether it's a good idea to have an unobstructed, unguarded ventilation shaft that goes all the way to the core of your Death Star.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I hadn't thought of that but it is quite silly, particularly of course as it is not clear why a space station, the purpose of which is to hang around in space, has any external ventilation at all.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I'd imagine that the main weapon produces an enormous amount of heat - like rocket science, the design of the Death Star must have been principally a matter of plumbing.

    (Though my personal favourite obvious design flaw in the Star Wars movies is the design of the evil flagship in the Phantom Menace - even pre-WWI British warship designers would have considered it a tad foolish to have one's central reactor core right next door (seemingly without an armoured deck) to the hangar.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I suppose if I were designing a race of war machines that could genetically engineer themselves, become masters of interplanetary travel, and fucking travel through time, I might want to spot myself a couple of handicaps in case they ever decided to turn on me.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I am not even going to bother with "the stairs thing".

    There's an old Punch cartoon with two Daleks at the bottom of a stairwell with a door marked "Exit" at the top. One is saying to the other, "Well that's our plans for galactic domination buggered, then."

    ReplyDelete
  7. So the Daleks are badly designed - well, everyone muffs up occasionally. Just look at the Porsche Cayenne. Yeah, lets make a car that looks like an upside-down boat! Brilliant!

    Another question. If you were building Terminators that can travel back in time, wouldn't you want to send the latest model back in time to the Terminator factory, thus giving the designers an imroved model of the Terminator to improve upon? I imagine the same question applies to Daleks.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Yes, but the Dalek homeworld was designed from the outset to accommodate their special needs. You can't separate the two halves of the system like that. All the Daleks we see are citizen volunteers: what looks like aggression to us was, from their perspective, necessary pre-emption. They had a town hall meeting about it: one plunger, one vote. The blasters were then retrofitted.

    The Mordor economy, on the other hand. Energy self-sufficient, maybe, but I sense issues with food security.

    ReplyDelete
  9. assuming a blockade could cut off trade from the east and south* -- a dubious assumption given the geography -- mordor ate courtesy agrarian slave economy in its fertile southern reaches within the mountain chains: viz nurnen and the large inland sea of nurn (the lifeless ashy wasteland was limited to the plateau of gorgoroth)

    also i think orcs are perfectly content to eat one another when push comes to shove, though this possibly raises other issues in respect of security

    *viz the lands of rhûn, khand and harad, which were rich and peopled even tho we never hear much about them

    ReplyDelete
  10. i am so bored at work that i have managed to construct an argt (entirely convincing to myself) that tolkien was writing an allegory of the hayekian attitude to the state, viz "one ring to rule them all" = road to serfdom, "drop ring in cracks of doom" = "drown govt in bath" (as per grover norquist), the "return of the king" is the (re)instatement of the randian individual as moral-political sovereign, the shire is the blessed haven of the small businessman, gollum is john maynard keynes ect ect

    ReplyDelete
  11. 'Fertile', of course, is propaganda. The south of the country is semi-arid at best and the so-called sea of Nurnen - what's left of it - is badly polluted from refinery run-off. The diet is uniformly nutrient poor and the slave workforce a constant burden on the security apparatus. With potential trade routes blocked by both the terrain and the state's isolationist stance, and with no access to the sea, this is a dead-end regime; little more than an annoyance to the rich and peopled neighbouring lands of Rhun, Khand and Harad ...

    ReplyDelete
  12. discussion of this important issue in even nerdier realms of the net has concluded:

    i. the eastern border of mordor is totally permeable and easy to trade across (no mountains)
    ii. rhûn and the wine regions of dorwinion are close trading partners
    iii. mordor's main export is of course ARMS (forged in and around mount doom)
    iv. as you'd expect mordor is perfectly happy to sell arms to ALL SIDES and foment war between em to keep sales booming
    v. mordor's armies can live off the land more easily than any of their foes, as they are not picky abt what they eat
    vi. khand, harad et al favour a strong mordor as it is the only way they get some kind of a place at the top table, politically speaking (the top table being a numenorean racket)
    vii. mordor is very well placed to control river trade in all middle earth
    viii. access to the sea isn't such an issue when no one can sail to the other side of it
    ix. and anyway, who rules to waves? the corsairs of umbar, that's who! (also numenoreans of course but BAD ONES, in league with barad dur)

    ReplyDelete